The math is stark. Consider two investors who both earn 8% annually:
- Investor A starts at age 25, invests $300/month until 65 = $1,054,000
- Investor B starts at age 35, invests $300/month until 65 = $447,000
Investor A contributed only $36,000 more ($144,000 vs. $108,000) but ended up with $607,000 more. That extra decade of compounding more than doubled the final balance.
The lesson: the cost of waiting isn't linear — it's exponential. Every year you delay, you lose the most powerful compounding years at the end of your timeline.
